We recently released a version of the Loss of the Night app that works in Arabic, Catalan, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Romanian, and Spanish.
It may become possible for us to do another extended language release sometime in 2014. If you would like to volunteer to translate the app into another language, please send me an email. Most of our translators needed about a half day to do the job.
We currently have volunteers for Czech, Korean, (Brazilian) Portuguese, and Slovak.
Wednesday, January 8, 2014
Want to translate the app into another language?
More light ≠ better vision
Hyperventilating politicians occasionally assert that people talking about light pollution want to throw us all back to the dark ages. In fact, nothing could be further from the truth, and these photos by George Fleenor show why:
The unshielded security light produces a great deal of glare, which makes it difficult to see the man standing at the yard gate. With well designed lighting, you can actually reduce the total amount of light (saving lots of energy) while at the same time actually improving visibility.
The video below also demonstrates very dramatically how poorly your eye is able to judge luminance. For vision in a typical urban night environment, the total amount of light plays a relatively small role in determining how well you can see. The more important factor is how the light is distributed.
![]() |
| Security lighting by George Fleenor is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
The unshielded security light produces a great deal of glare, which makes it difficult to see the man standing at the yard gate. With well designed lighting, you can actually reduce the total amount of light (saving lots of energy) while at the same time actually improving visibility.
The video below also demonstrates very dramatically how poorly your eye is able to judge luminance. For vision in a typical urban night environment, the total amount of light plays a relatively small role in determining how well you can see. The more important factor is how the light is distributed.
Thursday, January 2, 2014
Quadrantid meteor shower, January 2-4
The peak of the Quadrantid meteor shower will occur some time in the next two days. The peak of the Quadrantids is intense (up to one per minute), but the timing is not very well known, so you need a bit of luck. If it's clear where you are tonight, go out to use the Loss of the Night app. While you're doing your observations, you might just happen to luck into a meteor shower!
Thanks to Alejandro Sanchez de Miguel for the tip.
Thanks to Alejandro Sanchez de Miguel for the tip.
2013 in review
Citizen Scientists have now been taking skyglow data with the Loss of the Night app since the end of April, and the New Year seems like a good time to give some feedback about how the project is going. Here's a map of all of the locations from which someone has submitted data:
The red dots show locations where the measurement can be used in analysis (no clouds, no twilight, no moon, at least 7 stars observed), and the black dots show locations where this criteria were not met. Hopefully, now that the app is available in Spanish, Chinese, and Japanese we will start to get more data from Asia and South America.
In total, participants have done 15,600 individual star searches in 2,241 sessions under night conditions (sun at least 16 degrees below the horizon and moon below the horizon). The 10 stars that have been searched for most frequently are:
Vega, 742x
Altair, 645x
Arcturus, 603x
Deneb, 450x
Capella, 340x
Alioth, 263x
Sadr, 262x
Polaris, 260x
Aldebaran, 228x
Kocab, 204x
Despite these large numbers, there are actually still 504 stars that no one has searched for. Most of these not-yet-studied stars are visible from the Southern Hemisphere, but a few are late winter stars that will star rising higher in the sky as winter progresses.
In 946 cases, the app has been used on a night with no clouds, and the observer has examined at least 7 stars (red dots in the map above). These are the minimum conditions we need in order to estimate the sky brightness, but the more stars a person observes, the more accurate the measurement is. So if you are an app user, please click "continue measuring" and add a few additional stars!
Thank you to everyone who has used the app! In the coming week I plan to write a post about our plans for a future upgrade, and I would really like your feedback to try to improve the app.
In case you missed them, here are the four most read posts of 2013:
2) Flashmob for Science
4) First Blog Post
Finally, we were featured on Eyes on the Sky this week, so I wanted to share the video. The more people that use the app, the more valuable the dataset becomes, so please share news of the app whenever you see it!
In total, participants have done 15,600 individual star searches in 2,241 sessions under night conditions (sun at least 16 degrees below the horizon and moon below the horizon). The 10 stars that have been searched for most frequently are:
Vega, 742x
Altair, 645x
Arcturus, 603x
Deneb, 450x
Capella, 340x
Alioth, 263x
Sadr, 262x
Polaris, 260x
Aldebaran, 228x
Kocab, 204x
Despite these large numbers, there are actually still 504 stars that no one has searched for. Most of these not-yet-studied stars are visible from the Southern Hemisphere, but a few are late winter stars that will star rising higher in the sky as winter progresses.
In 946 cases, the app has been used on a night with no clouds, and the observer has examined at least 7 stars (red dots in the map above). These are the minimum conditions we need in order to estimate the sky brightness, but the more stars a person observes, the more accurate the measurement is. So if you are an app user, please click "continue measuring" and add a few additional stars!
Thank you to everyone who has used the app! In the coming week I plan to write a post about our plans for a future upgrade, and I would really like your feedback to try to improve the app.
In case you missed them, here are the four most read posts of 2013:
2) Flashmob for Science
4) First Blog Post
Finally, we were featured on Eyes on the Sky this week, so I wanted to share the video. The more people that use the app, the more valuable the dataset becomes, so please share news of the app whenever you see it!
Monday, December 23, 2013
Random post
I was recently wondering about how good or bad humans are at choosing a single random number, and after a bit of googling I found out the answer was a bit different from what I expected (I'll do an update about it later). That in turn inspired me to try an experiment that's a bit different from the usual "think of a number between 1 and N".
Please click on a single button below:
To get a statistically significant result, we will likely need several hundred people to take part, so please share the link to this post with your friends, and then check back again in a week or so.
Saturday, December 21, 2013
View from your app - architectural lighting in Berlin
If you've ever taken a bus past Alexanderplatz in Berlin at night, you probably wondered what the blindingly bright lights along the side of the train station were for:
The lights are bright enough to hurt your eyes, and as you can see in the two photos above, their glare makes it much more difficult to see the people who are approaching you. From the side, it looks painful and awful, and unless you get off the bus and stand directly perpendicular to the lights you'll never figure out what the lights are for. Here it is:
It's pretty! Unfortunately, almost no one ever appreciates this view, because there is literally no reason to go to the place I was standing other than to take that photo. Take a look at the map below. Nearly everyone experiencing these lights walks between the "Berlin Alexanderplatz" marker to the "S+U Alexanderplatz..." marker, and only sees the bad view shown above. To see the nice view, you've got to cozy up with the construction site:
This is architectural lighting at its very worst! It painfully unpleasant to look at from the most common viewing angle of passers-by, and is directly subverting the goal of nearby public lighting: to improve visibility at night.
As a counter-example, check out this building on Friedrichstraße:
Very cool! Different, distinctive, attractive, and with relatively low luminance. Unfortunately, it seems like there wasn't a single lighting plan for the building... A blindingly bright white Marquee at the base of the building entirely spoils the effect that the lighting designer was going for:
Here's an example of boring, 20th century architectural lighting: Berlin's TV tower
One thing I think is interesting about this photo is you can see just how brightly the tower is lit - the full moon appears very modest in comparison. The TV tower is always far more interestingly lit during Berlin's festival of lights, and I have the feeling that it's also far more modestly lit during the festival.
Here's an example of what I call "shine a floodlamp approximately in the direction of the building", the Kirche am Sudstern:
The photo was taken from our research aircraft, and shows what a large fraction of light is wasted when architectural lighting is not done carefully. The ironic thing about badly floodlit churches is that in rural Europe the village church is often the most important source of skyglow for a large region. So the poorly designed lighting actually prevents people from seeing the Godly splendor of the night sky! European churches usually have stained glass windows, and every time I see a badly floodlit church I imagine how much more attractive it would be if the church was completely unlit other than a colorful glow from behind the stained glass.
Of course, it is possible to direct floodlights carefully, as this photo of the Berlin Cathedral shows:
From the air, Berlin Cathedral doesn't look like much, but from the ground it's spectacular:
The difference between the Cathedral and the Kirche am Sudstern above is that instead of just floodlighting the entire building, the lighting designer for the Cathedral chose to highlight certain elements by using a large number of smaller, more focused floodlights. The lighting is still not ideal, however, both because it's quite a bit brighter than necessary and because from the ground level a significant amount of light blinds you when you are looking away from the Cathedral (towards the flood lights:
Right next to Berlin Cathedral is another more attractively lit building, the Altes Museum:
Unfortunately, I didn't have a tripod, so my photo doesn't do it justice. The great thing about the Altes Museum is that the lamps are totally invisible to the public. There's no glare, and the amount of light emitted to the sky is very reduced compared to many designs.
Finally, we come to the Brandenburg Gate:
The Brandenburg Gate does shine quite a bit of light directly up into the sky, but it is a single building in the capital of the country. More than that, the Brandenburg Gate is THE symbol of Berlin, as well as a symbol of all of Germany. As a light pollution researcher and dark sky advocate, I have no problem with the Brandenburg Gate being relatively brightly lit. But not every building is the Brandenburg Gate, and not every church and monument ought to be lit!
Now to be fair, in big cities architectural lighting is way down on the list of sources of light pollution. Nevertheless, I think that people interested in lighting their buildings have a social responsibility to ensure that their installations do not affect public safety by reducing visibility, that they make a serious effort to limit stray light, and that they light the building modestly in order to avoid wasting energy.
If you want to reduce light pollution, the most important thing to get right is street lighting. By coincidence, while I was out taking some of the photos above I snapped these examples of some truly awful "decorative" street lamps (filled with dead bugs) on Unter den Linden:
The moon makes an appearance again in the 2nd photo. For comparison, check out these examples of recently installed excellent decorative street lighting from Spain.
![]() |
| Bad lighting at Alexanderplatz 1 by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
| Bad lighting at Alexanderplatz 2 by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
The lights are bright enough to hurt your eyes, and as you can see in the two photos above, their glare makes it much more difficult to see the people who are approaching you. From the side, it looks painful and awful, and unless you get off the bus and stand directly perpendicular to the lights you'll never figure out what the lights are for. Here it is:
![]() |
| Bad lighting at Alexanderplatz 3 by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
It's pretty! Unfortunately, almost no one ever appreciates this view, because there is literally no reason to go to the place I was standing other than to take that photo. Take a look at the map below. Nearly everyone experiencing these lights walks between the "Berlin Alexanderplatz" marker to the "S+U Alexanderplatz..." marker, and only sees the bad view shown above. To see the nice view, you've got to cozy up with the construction site:
This is architectural lighting at its very worst! It painfully unpleasant to look at from the most common viewing angle of passers-by, and is directly subverting the goal of nearby public lighting: to improve visibility at night.
As a counter-example, check out this building on Friedrichstraße:
| Helios Klinik lights by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Very cool! Different, distinctive, attractive, and with relatively low luminance. Unfortunately, it seems like there wasn't a single lighting plan for the building... A blindingly bright white Marquee at the base of the building entirely spoils the effect that the lighting designer was going for:
![]() |
| Terrible Marquee ruins view by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Here's an example of boring, 20th century architectural lighting: Berlin's TV tower
| Berliner Fernsehturm with moon by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
One thing I think is interesting about this photo is you can see just how brightly the tower is lit - the full moon appears very modest in comparison. The TV tower is always far more interestingly lit during Berlin's festival of lights, and I have the feeling that it's also far more modestly lit during the festival.
Here's an example of what I call "shine a floodlamp approximately in the direction of the building", the Kirche am Sudstern:
![]() |
| Kirche am Sudstern by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
The photo was taken from our research aircraft, and shows what a large fraction of light is wasted when architectural lighting is not done carefully. The ironic thing about badly floodlit churches is that in rural Europe the village church is often the most important source of skyglow for a large region. So the poorly designed lighting actually prevents people from seeing the Godly splendor of the night sky! European churches usually have stained glass windows, and every time I see a badly floodlit church I imagine how much more attractive it would be if the church was completely unlit other than a colorful glow from behind the stained glass.
Of course, it is possible to direct floodlights carefully, as this photo of the Berlin Cathedral shows:
![]() |
| Berliner Dom from air by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
From the air, Berlin Cathedral doesn't look like much, but from the ground it's spectacular:
| Berliner Dom from ground by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
The difference between the Cathedral and the Kirche am Sudstern above is that instead of just floodlighting the entire building, the lighting designer for the Cathedral chose to highlight certain elements by using a large number of smaller, more focused floodlights. The lighting is still not ideal, however, both because it's quite a bit brighter than necessary and because from the ground level a significant amount of light blinds you when you are looking away from the Cathedral (towards the flood lights:
| Glare from the floodlamps of Berliner Dom. |
Right next to Berlin Cathedral is another more attractively lit building, the Altes Museum:
| Altes Museum at night by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Unfortunately, I didn't have a tripod, so my photo doesn't do it justice. The great thing about the Altes Museum is that the lamps are totally invisible to the public. There's no glare, and the amount of light emitted to the sky is very reduced compared to many designs.
Finally, we come to the Brandenburg Gate:
![]() |
| The Brandenburg Gate. Photo copyright 2011 C. Kyba. |
The Brandenburg Gate does shine quite a bit of light directly up into the sky, but it is a single building in the capital of the country. More than that, the Brandenburg Gate is THE symbol of Berlin, as well as a symbol of all of Germany. As a light pollution researcher and dark sky advocate, I have no problem with the Brandenburg Gate being relatively brightly lit. But not every building is the Brandenburg Gate, and not every church and monument ought to be lit!
Now to be fair, in big cities architectural lighting is way down on the list of sources of light pollution. Nevertheless, I think that people interested in lighting their buildings have a social responsibility to ensure that their installations do not affect public safety by reducing visibility, that they make a serious effort to limit stray light, and that they light the building modestly in order to avoid wasting energy.
If you want to reduce light pollution, the most important thing to get right is street lighting. By coincidence, while I was out taking some of the photos above I snapped these examples of some truly awful "decorative" street lamps (filled with dead bugs) on Unter den Linden:
![]() |
| Bug filled decorative streetlamp by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Click to embuggen. |
| Bug filled decorative streetlamps by Christopher Kyba is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
The moon makes an appearance again in the 2nd photo. For comparison, check out these examples of recently installed excellent decorative street lighting from Spain.
Labels:
aerial photography,
Berlin,
crazy lighting,
view from your app
Friday, December 20, 2013
Loss of the Night app now available in 11 languages!
I'm very happy to announce that we have released a new version of the Loss of the Night app with expanded language support! The app can now be used in Arabic, Catalan, Chinese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Romanian, and Spanish! You can read more about it in our press release.
Now we need your help to get the word out! If you have a friend that speaks one of those languages, please pass them the link to the app, and ask them to promote it in their language using social media. You can also help us find new users worldwide by giving the app a good rating in the play store and leaving a positive comment in your own language.
We would like to publicly recognize the considerable amount of work done by the following volunteer translators:
Arabic: Amr Al-Omari
Catalan: Salvador Ribas
Chinese: Yongguang Zhang
French: Olivier Domingue, Johanne Roby, Martin Aubé, and Romain Clément
Italian: Andrea Giacomelli
Japanese: Nobuaki Ochi
Polish: Ania Wisniewska
Romanian: Catalin Daniel Galatanu
Spanish: Salvador Ribas
Thanks to all of you for helping make this a truly international project!
Note: The next measurement period starts tonight, although there will only be a window of an hour or so to make a measurement because of the rising nearly full moon. By December 25, it will be possible to take measurements right up until midnight. The current measurement period will last until about January 4.
Now we need your help to get the word out! If you have a friend that speaks one of those languages, please pass them the link to the app, and ask them to promote it in their language using social media. You can also help us find new users worldwide by giving the app a good rating in the play store and leaving a positive comment in your own language.
We would like to publicly recognize the considerable amount of work done by the following volunteer translators:
Arabic: Amr Al-Omari
Catalan: Salvador Ribas
Chinese: Yongguang Zhang
French: Olivier Domingue, Johanne Roby, Martin Aubé, and Romain Clément
Italian: Andrea Giacomelli
Japanese: Nobuaki Ochi
Polish: Ania Wisniewska
Romanian: Catalin Daniel Galatanu
Spanish: Salvador Ribas
Thanks to all of you for helping make this a truly international project!
Note: The next measurement period starts tonight, although there will only be a window of an hour or so to make a measurement because of the rising nearly full moon. By December 25, it will be possible to take measurements right up until midnight. The current measurement period will last until about January 4.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










